King Herod’s command to slay the children in Bethlehem came with a very telling stipulation. Herod had calculated out the days, weeks, months that transpired between his meeting with the wise men and the date of his commandment. He recognized that Jesus could have been as much as two years old by the time he figured out that the wise men were not coming back to visit with him, as he had requested. This provides us an upper limit as to how old Jesus was when the Magi visited with him – no older than two years old. Without the use of the word “baby” within Matthew’s account, with multiple statements of Jesus being “the young child,” and with Herod’s recognition of the upper-age limit for Jesus, that being two years old, it is completely reasonable for us to conclude that the representation of so many manger and nativity scenes during the Christmas season are incorrect. This lack of precision with the text has a negative effect upon one’s theology.
That rounds out our five parts to the original true-or-false question:
- The three wise men, FALSE
- From the east, TRUE
- Visited baby Jesus, FALSE
- Visited Him in a manger, FALSE
- Brought gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh. TRUE
So how did you do? Were you a good Berean; you knew initially that this question was to be answered with “False,” and you knew precisely which parts were accurate and which parts made the overall statement untrue? Or, have you discovered that tradition has influenced your understanding of what the Bible says and that you are in need of reading Scripture more carefully and to develop a more discerning mindset when it comes to what you hear within Christian circles?
Tradition has had a tremendous influence upon Christendom. That influence has not been for its betterment and our enemy is very pleased that that is the case. The primary reason for all of the confusion that comes with tradition is a failure to obey God’s command for Bible study: